Urysohn's Lemma

Urysohn's lemma in topology states that
if X is a normal topological space and A and B are disjoint closed subsets of X, then there exists a continuous function from X into the unit interval 1,
f : X1,
such that f(a) = 0 for all a in A and f(b) = 1 for all b in B.
The lemma, sometimes called "the first non-trivial fact of point set topology", is often used to construct continuous functions with various properties; it is widely applicable since all metric spaces and all compact Hausdorff spaces are normal. The lemma is generalized by (and usually used in the proof of) the Tietze extension theorem. Note that in the statement above, we do not, and in general cannot, require that f(x) ≠ 0 and ≠ 1 for x outside of A and B. This is only possible in perfectly normal spaces. The lemma is named after Paul Samuilovich Urysohn,

Proof sketch

For every dyadic fraction r ∈ (0,1), we are going to construct an open subset U(r) of X such that:
  1. U(r) contains A and is disjoint from B for all r
  2. for r < s, the closure of U(r) is contained in U(s)
Once we have these sets, we define f(x) = inf { r : xU(r) } for every xX. Using the fact that the dyadic rationals are dense, it is then not too hard to show that f is continuous and has the property f(A) ⊆ {0} and f(B) ⊆ {1}. In order to construct the sets U(r), we actually do a little bit more: we construct sets U(r) and V(r) such that
  • AU(r) and BV(r) for all r
  • U(r) and V(r) are open and disjoint for all r
  • for r < s, V(s) is contained in the complement of U(r) and the complement of V(r) is contained in U(s)
Since the complement of V(r) is closed and contains U(r), the latter condition then implies condition (2) from above. This construction proceeds by mathematical induction. Since X is normal, we can find two disjoint open sets U(1/2) and V(1/2) which contain A and B, respectively. Now assume that n≥1 and the sets U(a/2n) and V(a/2n) have already been constructed for a = 1,...,2n-1. Since X is normal, we can find two disjoint open sets which contain the complement of V(a/2n) and the complement of U((a+1)/2n), respectively. Call these two open sets U((2a+1)/2n+1) and V((2a+1)/2n+1), and verify the above three conditions. The Mizar project has completely formalized and automatically checked a proof of Urysohn's lemma in the URYSOHN3 file.

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
pope anacletus
frauenburg
george westinghouse
antiviral drug
reductionism
rms queen elizabeth 2
biplane
ignacy krasicki
reduction (philosophy)
laura gemser
carburetor
clef
full stop
middle c
musical staff
robert goddard
chromatic scale
st. hedwig's cathedral
patrice lumumba
gustav holst
irina privalova
the planets
nan
biological determinism
byron white
dili
age of the earth
digital audio broadcasting
willy brandt
corporate personhood
lake baringo
buchenwald
phase constant
tove jansson
hydronium
methylchloroisothiazolinone
uss winston s. churchill (ddg 81)
fine structure constant
haidinger's brush
nellie tayloe ross
isabella of angouleme
pope eleuterus
henry morton stanley
united states constitutional law