United States V. Place

bgcolor="6699FF" | United States v. Place
align="center" | 100px
Supreme Court of the United States
bgcolor="6699FF" | Argued March 2, 1983
Decided June 20, 1983
{| align="center"
valign="top"|Full case name: valign="top"|''United States v. Raymond J. Place
valign="top"|Citations: valign="top"|462 U.S. 696; 103 S. Ct. 2637; 77 L. Ed. 2d 110; 1983 U.S. LEXIS 74; 51 U.S.L.W. 4844
valign="top"|Prior history: valign="top"|Defendant's motion to suppress denied, 498 F. Supp. 1217 (E.D.N.Y. 1980); reversed, 660 F.2d 44 (2nd. Cir. 1981); certiorari granted, 457 U.S. 1104 (1982).
bgcolor="6699FF" | Holdings
Police may temporarily seize suspicious luggage if they have a reasonable, articulable suspicion that it contains narcotics. Allowing a narcotics-detecting police dog to sniff the luggage to confirm or dispel that suspicion is not a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. The length of time that had elapsed between the seizure and the dog sniff in this case was longer than permissible under the circumstances, and was thus unreasonable. Second Circuit affirmed.
bgcolor="6699FF" | Court membership
{| align="center"
Chief Justice: Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices:William J. Brennan, Byron R. White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Lewis F. Powell }
bgcolor="6699FF" | Case opinions
{| align="center"
Majority by: O'Connor
Joined by: Burger, White, Rehnquist, Powell, Stevens
Concurrence by: Brennan
Joined by: Marshall
Concurrence by: Blackmun
Joined by: Marshall }
bgcolor="6699FF" | Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. IV
United States v. Place was a 1983 decision of the United States Supreme Court that expanded the "stop and frisk" doctrine to allow police officers to briefly seize a suspicious person's luggage without a warrant or even probable cause in order to further investigate their suspicions. Although a physical search of a passenger's luggage was not permissible during such an investigative seizure, the court held that the use of a police dog to sniff a person's luggage in order to detect narcotics was not a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and was thus permissible during such a seizure.

References

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
alta capella
jamming in the aattic (2004)
jackinabox
edwin e. witte
oisn kelly
andrew parrott
ollie p. roberts
termination of rocket experiments at cuxhaven
taverner consort and players
democratic constitutional congress
karel husa
la cuarta
john holloway (musician)
roger e. moore
jyotirmoy datta
darrin fletcher
untitled (song)
london classical players
orchestra of the age of enlightenment
nazi occupation of norway
william c. marland
the english concert
andrew manze
clea (band)
in the groove (composition)
charles gibson (disambiguation)
machico
iptscrae
everything you know is wrong
blue horses
world junior curling championships
gua de pena
olin levi warner
oengus i of the picts
noonmati
fury in the slaughterhouse
ontheline
jewel ball
mummification (bdsm)
station warrant officer
brukdown
kim kashkashian
mittag leffler function
golden tabby