|
|
|
|
|
The New Pearl HarborThe New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9-11 (ISBN 1566565529) is a book written by David Ray Griffin. Griffin has been Professor of Philosophy of Religion at the Claremont School of Theology in California for over 30 years. He is the author and editor of more than 20 books. Howard Zinn, the author of A People's History of the United States, calls The New Pearl Harbor "the most persuasive argument I have seen for further investigation on the Bush administration's relationship to that historic and troubling event." Griffin offers no definitive theory as to the perpetration of the World Trade Center attacks. He presents at least 23 pieces of evidence supporting a conclusion of Bush administration complicity, and at least 38 arguments to reject an explanation of coincidence. Griffen makes a case for a full and independent investigation into the September 11, 2001 attacks. Griffin's Claims for Official Complicity Griffen claims the following evidence exists and that it supports his theory of official complicity. (As summarized by Griffin from various cited sources) - Evidence that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were already planned for geopolitical reasons, so that 9-11 provided not the reason for the wars but merely the pretext.
- Evidence that men with connections to Al-Qaeda were allowed into the United States in spite of regulations that should have kept them out.
- Evidence that men with connections to Al-Qaeda were allowed to train in US flight schools.
- Evidence that the attaacks of 9-11 could not have succeeded without an order from the highest level of government to suspend normal operating procedures for responding to hijackings.
- Evidence that US political and military leaders made misleading and even false statements about their response to the hijackings.
- Evidence in particular that the presently accepted official account, according to which jet fighter planes were scrambled but arrived too late, was invented some days after 9-11.
- Evidence that the collapse of the WTC buildings was brought about by explosives, so that participation by the US government in the prevention of an adequate examination of the debris, especially the steel, constitutes evidence of its participation of a cover-up.
- Evidence that someone in authority sought to ensure that there would be deaths in the attacks on the second WTC tower and the Pentagon by not having these buildings evacuated.
- Evidence that what hit The Pentagon was not a Boeing 757 but a much smaller aircraft, such as a guided missile.
- Evidence that Flight 93 was shot down after authorities learned that the passengers were getting control of it.
- Evidence that United States Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld received advance knowledge of two of the attacks.
- Evidence that President Bush on 9-11 feigned ignorance of the occurrence and seriousness of the attacks.
- Evidence that President Bush and his Secret Service knew on 9-11 that he would not be a target of attacks.
- Evidence that the FBI had specific knowledge of the time and targets of the attacks at least a month in advance.
- Evidence that the CIA and other intelligence agencies would have had very specific advance knowledge of the attacks by means of the put options purchased shortly before 9-11.
- Evidence that the Bush administration lied about not having had specific warnings about the attacks.
- Evidence that the FBI and other federal agencies prevented investigations prior to 9-11 that might have uncovered the plot.
- Evidence that US officials sought to conceal evidence of involvement by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence in the planning of 9-11.
- Evidence that US officials sought to conceal the presence of the ISI chief in Washington, DC during the week of 9-11.
- Evidence that the FBI and other federal agencies blocked investigations after the attacks that might have revealed the true perpetrators.
- Evidence that the US did not really seek to kill or capture Osama bin Laden either before or after the attacks.
- Evidence that figures central to the Bush administration had desired a "new Pearl Harbor" because of various benefits it would bring.
- Evidence of motive provided by the predictable benefits that this event, called by Bush himself "the Pearl Harbor of the 21st century" did bestow on the Bush administration.
- Evidence against the alternative explanation - the incompetence theory - provided by the fact that those who were allegedly guilty of incompetence were not fired but, in some cases, promoted.
Griffin's Claims for a Coincidence Theory Griffin makes the following claims defending his theory against claims of coincidence. (As summarized by Mr. Griffin from various cited sources) - Several FAA flight controllers exhibited extreme incompetence on 9-11, and evidently on that day only.
- The officials in charge at both National Military Command Center and NORAD also acted incompetently on 9-11, and evidently on that day only.
- In particular, when NMCC-NORAD officials did finally order jet fighters to be scrambled to protect New York and Washington, they ordered them in each case from more distant bases, rather than from McGuire Air Force Base and Andrews Air Force Base, respectively.
- After public statements saying that Andrews Air Force Base had no jet fighters on alert to protect Washington, its website, which had previously said that many jets were always on alert, was altered.
- Several pilots who normally are airborne and going full speed in under three minutes, all took much longer to get up on 9-11.
- These same pilots, flying planes capable of going 1,500 to 1,850 miles per hour, on that day were all evidently able to get their planes to fly only 300 to 700 miles per hour.
- The collapse of the buildings of the World Trade Center, besides occurring at almost free-fall speed, exhibited other signs of being controlled demolitions: molten steel, seismic shocks, and fine dust were all produced.
- The video and physical evidence suggesting that controlled demolition was the collapse co-exists with testimony from people in these buildings that they heard, felt and saw the effects of explosions.
- The collapse of WTC-1 and WTC-2 had some of the same features as the collapse of WTC-7, even though the latter collapse could not be attributed to the impact and jet fuel of an airplane.
- Both the North and South towers collapsed just as their respective fires were dying down, even though this meant that the South tower, which had been hit second, collapsed first.
- Governmental agencies had the debris, incuding the steel, from the collapsed WTC buildings removed without investigation, which is what would be expected if the government wanted to prevent evidence of explosives from being discovered.
- Physical evidence suggesting that what hit the Pentagon could not have been a Boeing 757 co-exists with testimony of several witnesses that the aircraft that did hit the Pentagon was far smaller than a 757.
- This evidence about the aircraft that hit the Pentagon co-exists with reports that Flight 77 crashed in Kentucky or Ohio.
- This evidence co-exists with the fact that the only evidence that Flight 77 did not crash, was supplied by an attorney closely associated with the Bush administration.
- Evidence that Flight 77 did not return to Washington to hit the Pentagon co-exists with the fact that when the flight control transcript was releasedd, the final 20 minutes were missing.
- The fact that the aircraft that hit the Pentagon did so only after executing a very difficult maneuver, coexists with the fact that it struck a section of the Pentagon that besided containing none of its leaders, was the section in which the strike would cause the least death and destruction.
- On the same day in which jet fighters were unable to protect the Pentagon from an attack by a single airplane, the missiles that normally protect the Pentagon also failed to do so.
- Sounds from cell phones inside Flight 93 suggesting that the plane had been hit by a missile were matched by many reports to this effect from witnesses on the ground.
- This evidence that Flight 93 was shot down co-exists with reports from both civilian and military leaders that there was intent to shoot this flight down.
- The only plane that was evidently shot down, Flight 93, was the only one in which it appeared that passengers were going to gain control.
- The evidence that Flight 93 was shot down after the passengers were about to gain control co-exists with the fact that the flight control transcript for this flight was not released.
- That coincidence co-exists with the fact that when the cockpit recording of Flight 93 was relased, the final three minutes were missing.
- Evidence showing that the US government had far more specific evidence of what was to occur on 9-11 than it has admitted co-exists with evidence that it actively blocked investigations that might have prevented the attacks.
- Reports of obstructions from FBI agents in Minneapolis co-exist with similar reports from Chicago and New York.
- Reports of such obstruction prior to 9-11 co-exist with reports that investigations after 9-11 were also obstructed.
- These reports of obstructionism co-exist with multiple reports suggesting that the US government did not really try to capture or kill Osama bin Laden either prior to or after 9-11, with the result that several people independently suggested that the US government must be working for bin Laden, or vice versa.
- All these reports co-exist with reports of hijackers being allowed in the country in spite of known terrorist connections or visa violations.
- These reports about immigration violations co-exist with evidence that some of these same men were allowed to train at US flight schools, some on military bases.
- This evidence of training at various American flight schools co-exists with reports that US officials tried to conceal this evidence.
- The traumatic events of 9-11 occurred just a year after a document published by the Project for the New American Century, an organization whose founders included several men who became central figures in the Bush administration, referred to benefits that could come from "a new Pearl Harbor."
- The "unifying Pearl Harbor sort of purple American fury" referred to in the Skull and Bones-influenced Time magazine and produced by the 9-11 attacks did benefit the Bush adminnistration in many ways.
- A credible report that spokespersons for the Bush adminstration had earlier announced that the US government was planning a war on Afghanistan, which would begin before the middle of October, co-exists with the fact that the attacks of 9-11, by occurring on that date, gave US military forces time to be ready to attack Afghanistan on October 7.
- Ahmad Massood, whose continued existence would have posed problems for US plans in Afghanistan, was assassinated, reportedly by ISI operatives, just after the head of the ISI, General Mahmoud Ahmad, had been meeting in Washington for several days with the head of the CIA.
- In the White House's version of the recording of Condoleezza Rice's press briefing on May 16 2001, the only portion that was inaudible was the portion in which the person under discussion, mentioned as having been in Washington on 9-11, was identified as "the ISI chief."
- Evidence of official efforts to conceal General Ahmad's presence in Washington co-exists with evidence that, after it became known that General Ahmad had ordered $100,000 wired to Mohamed Atta, US leaders exerted pressure on the ISI to dismiss him from his post quietly.
- Evidence of these attempts to conceal General Ahmad's involvement in 9-11 co-exists with evidence that the FBI and other federal agencies sought to obscure the fact that Saeed Sheikh, the man who wired the money to Atta, was an ISI agent.
- The fact that agents in FBI headquarters who presided over the alleged intelligence failure that allowed 9-11 to happen, widely called the biggest intelligence failure since Pearl Harbor, were promoted instead of fired or otherwise punished co-exists with the fact that other intelligence agencies also reported that there had been no pupnishments for poor performance related to 9-11.
# This evidence of lack of punishment for poor performance co-exists with reports that intelligence officers who were diligently trying to pursue investigations related to 9-11 suffered negative treatment from superiors.
|
 |
|
| Copyright 2005-2009 OnPedia.com. All Rights Reserved |
|
|