Sum Rule In Integration

In calculus the sum rule in integration states that
\int \left(f + g\right) dx = \int f dx + \int g dx
It is of constant use in going from the left hand to the right-hand side, to integrate sums. It is derived from the sum rule in differentiation; and is one part of the linearity of integration.

Application to indefinite integrals

For example, if you know that the integral of exp(x) is exp(x) from calculus with exponentials and that the integral of cos(x) is sin(x) from calculus with trigonometry then:
\int \left(e^x + \cos{x}\right) dx = \int e^x dx + \int \cos{x}\ dx = e^x + \sin{x} + C
Some other general results come from this rule. For example:
\int \left(u-v\right)dx
= \int \left(u+\left(-v\right)\right) dx
= \int u dx + \int \left(-v\right)dx
= \int u dx + \left(-\int vdx\right)
= \int u dx - \int v dx
The proof above relied on the special case of the constant factor rule in integration with k=-1. Thus, the sum rule might be written as:
\int u \pm v dx = \int u dx \pm \int v dx
Another basic application is that sigma and integral signs can be changed around. That is:
\int \sum^b_{r=a} \left(f\left(r,x\right)\right) dx = \sum^b_{r=a} \left( \int f\left(r,x\right) dx\right)
This is simply because:
\int \sum^b_{r=a} \left(f\left(r,x\right)\right) dx
= \int \left( f\left(a,x\right) + f\left(\left(a+1\right),x\right) + f\left(\left(a+2\right),x\right) + \dots + f\left(\left(b-1\right),x\right) + f\left(b,x\right) \right) dx
= \int f\left(a,x\right)dx + \int f\left(\left(a+1\right),x\right) dx + \int f\left(\left(a+2\right),x\right) dx + \dots + \int f\left(\left(b-1\right),x\right) dx + \int f\left(b,x\right) dx
= \sum^b_{r=a} \left(\int f\left(r,x\right) dx\right)
Since the integral is similar to a sum anyway, this is hardly surprising.

Application to definite integrals

Passing rom the case of indefinite integrals to the case of integrals over an interval a,b, we get exactly the same form of rule (the arbitrary constant of integration disappears).

The proof of the rule

First note that from the definition of integration as the antiderivative, the reverse process of differentiation:
u = \int \frac{du}{dx} dx
v = \int \frac{dv}{dx} dx
Adding these,
u + v = \int \frac{du}{dx} dx + \int \frac{dv}{dx} dx \quad \mbox{(1)}
Now take the sum rule in differentiation:
\frac{d}{dx} \left(u+v\right) = \frac{du}{dx} + \frac{dv}{dx}
Integrate both sides with respect to x:
u + v = \int \left( \frac{du}{dx} + \frac{dv}{dx}\right) dx \quad \mbox{(2)}
So we have, looking at (1) and (2):
u+v = \int \frac{du}{dx} dx + \int \frac{dv}{dx}dx
u+v = \int \left(\frac{du}{dx} + \frac{dv}{dx}\right) dx
Therefore:
\int \left(\frac{du}{dx} + \frac{dv}{dx}\right) dx = \int \frac{du}{dx} dx + \int \frac{dv}{dx} dx
Now substitute:
f = \frac{du}{dx}
g = \frac{dv}{dx}

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
republic p 47
united states army air force
java data objects
united states army air corps
integration by parts
mexican peso
hofsjkull
peyronie's disease
bristol mercury
auguste de montferrand
light bomber
besm
bristol phoenix
harlingen, netherlands
torpedo bomber
pallium
smerdis of persia
shrine of the three kings at cologne cathedral
semiramis of babylon
cedar point
sublimation
atargatis
pilum
businessman
smoot
valkenburg (south holland)
constant factor rule in integration
nancy pelosi
ambassadors from germany
uniformed services of the united states
ruth brown
ray charles
cleveland, england
hiking
naval helicopter association
buffalo springfield
fats domino
paul touvier
h 3 sea king
constant factor rule in differentiation
ibm 7090
hants county, nova scotia
list of relativistic equations
ernst ruska