|
|
|
|
|
Stephen D. UnwinStephen D. Unwin is a physicist, mathematician and author best known for his book, The Probability of God. Unwin received his doctorate in theoretical physics from the University of Manchester for his research in the field of quantum gravity. Formerly the technical attach to the United States Department of Energy for the British government, he is president of his own consulting firm, specializing in risk management for various Fortune 100 clients. In his book, Unwin argues that a mathematical equation developed by Thomas Bayes can be used to calculate the probability that God exists. Unwin employs Bayesian probabilities, a statistical method devised by Reverend Thomas Bayes. He begins with a 50 percent probability that God exists (arguing that 5050 represents "maximum ignorance"), then applies a modified Bayesian theorem: -
In this model, the probability of God's existence after the evidence is considered is a function of the probability before times D ("Divine Indicator Scale"): 10 indicates the evidence is 10 times as likely to be produced if God exists, 2 is two times as likely if God exists, 1 is neutral, 0.5 is moderately more likely if God does not exist, and 0.1 is much more likely if God does not exist. Unwin offers the following figures for six lines of evidence: recognition of goodness (D = 10), existence of moral evil (D = 0.5), existence of natural evil (D = 0.1), intranatural miracles (prayers) (D = 2), extranatural miracles (resurrection) (D = 1), and religious experiences (D = 2). Plugging these figures into the above formula (in sequence, where the Pafter figure for the first computation is used for the Pbefore figure in the second computation, and so on for all six Ds), Unwin concludes: "The probability that God exists is 67%." But then he admits freely that it's just a game played with numbers: "This number has a subjective element since it reflects my assessment of the evidence." Unwin's comment refers to his estimates of the various "D" values used to obtain his estimate, whose values would be disputed by many. A reviewer on Amazon.com's "customer reviews section", using the pseudonym "DancesWithAnxiety", was one of a number of reviewers there to critique the book on this point: - Needless to say, the quality of this superceding evidence, and the numerical values assigned to it, are critical to the outcome. Unwin does not go far enough in establishing that numbers can be assigned to the points of evidence he gives, much less that *his* numbers are the right ones...More work remains to be done before Baylesian (sic)probabilities can be truly said to illuminate the question of God's existence. I like the author's style, I admire the spirit of his attempt, I appreciate the clear lesson in probabilities, but I am not convinced.
External links * Unwin's website, including links to many media interviews and reviews.
|
 |
|
| Copyright 2005-2009 OnPedia.com. All Rights Reserved |
|
|