|
|
|
|
|
Steinhaus-moser NotationIn mathematics, Moser's polygon notation is a means of expressing certain extremely large numbers. It is an extension of Steinhaus's polygon notation. n in a triangle (a number n in a triangle) means nn n in a square (a number n in a square) is equivalent with "the number n inside n triangles, which are all nested" n in a pentagon (a number n in a pentagon) is equivalent with "the number n inside n squares, which are all nested" etc.: n written in an (m+1)-sided polygon is equivalent with "the number n inside n m-sided polygons, which are all nested" Steinhaus only defined the triangle, the square, and a circle n in a cicle, equivalent to the pentagon defined above. Steinhaus defined: - "mega" is the number equivalent to 2 in a circle: 2 in a circle
- "megiston" is the number equivalent to 10 in a circle: 10 in a circle
Moser's number is the number represented by "2 in a megagon", where a "megagon" is a polygon with "mega" sides. Alternative notations: - use the functions square(x) and triangle(x)
- let M(n,m,p) be the number represented by the number n in m nested p-sided polygons; then the rules are:
- and
- mega =
- moser =
Mega Note that 2 in a circle is already a very large number, since 2 in a circle = square(square(2)) = square(triangle(triangle(2))) = square(triangle(22)) = square(triangle(4)) = square(44) = square(256) = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256)...))) triangles = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256256)...))) triangles = triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(3.2 × 10616)...))) triangles = ... Using the other notation: mega = M(2,1,5) = M(256,256,3) With the function we have mega = where the superscript denotes a functional power, not a numerical power. We have (note the convention that powers are evaluated from right to left): - M(256,2,3) =
- M(256,3,3) = ≈
Similarly: - M(256,4,3) ≈
- M(256,5,3) ≈
etc. Thus: - mega = , where denotes a functional power of the function .
Rounding more crudely (replacing the 257 at the end by 256), we get mega ≈ , using Knuth's up-arrow notation. Note that after the first few steps the value of is each time approximately equal to . In fact, it is even approximately equal to (see also approximate arithmetic for very large numbers). Using base 10 powers we get: - ( is added to the 616)
- ( is added to the , which is negligible; therefore just a 10 is added at the bottom)
... - mega = , where denotes a functional power of the function . Hence
Moser's number It has been proved that Moser's number, although extremely large, is smaller than Graham's number. Therefore, using the Conway chained arrow notation, -
See also External
|
 |
|
| Copyright 2005-2009 OnPedia.com. All Rights Reserved |
|
|