Sprague-grundy Theorem

In combinatorial game theory, the Sprague–Grundy theorem states that every impartial game is equivalent to a nimber. It was discovered independently by R. P. Sprague and P. M. Grundy.

Definitions

For the purposes of the Sprague–Grundy theorem, a game is a two-player game of perfect information satisfying the ending condition (all games come to an end: there are no infinite lines of play) and the normal play condition (a player who cannot move loses). An impartial game is one such as nim, in which each player has the same available moves in every position. Impartial games fall into two outcome classes: either the next player wins (an N-position) or the previous player wins (a P-position). An impartial game can be identified with the set of positions that can be reached in one move (these are called the options of the game). Thus the game with options A, B, or C is the set {A, B, C}. A nimber is a special game denoted *n for some ordinal n. We define *0 = {} (the empty set), then *1 = {*0}, *2 = {*0, *1}, and *(n+1) = *n ∪ {*n}. When n is an integer, the nimber *n = {*0, *1, ..., *(n−1)}. This corresponds to a heap of n counters in the game of nim, hence the name. Two games G and H can be added to make a new game G+H in which a player can chose either to move in G or in H. Two games G and G' are equivalent if for every game H, the game G+H is in the same outcome class as G'+H. For impartial games, this is the same as the condition that G+G' is a P-position.

Proof

We prove the theorem by structural induction on the set representing the game. Consider a game G = \{G_1, G_2, \ldots, G_k\}. By the induction hypothesis, all of the options are equivalent to nimbers, say G_i = *n_i. We will show that G = *m, where m is the mex of the numbers n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_k, that is the minimal excluded number: the smallest non-negative integer not equal to some n_i. So now we need to show that G+*m is a P-position. We do so by giving an explicit strategy for the second player. Suppose that the first player moves in the component *m to the option *m' where m'. But since m was the minimal excluded number, the second player can move in G to an option G_i equivalent to *m'. Suppose instead that the first player moves in the component G to the option G_i, which is equivalent to *n_i. If n_i < m then the second player moves from *m to *n_i. If n_i > m then the second player moves *n_i to *m. It's not possible that n_i = m because m was defined to be different from all the n_i.

Development

The Sprague–Grundy theorem has been developed into the field of combinatorial game theory, notably by E. R. Berlekamp, John Horton Conway and others. The field is presented in the books Winning Ways for your Mathematical Plays and On Numbers and Games.

External links

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
main distribution frame
main lobe
main storage
maintainability
maintenance
managed object
manchester code
mandrel wrapping
margin
maritime broadcast communications net
master frequency generator
master station
material scattering
maximal ratio combiner
maximum usable frequency
maximum user signaling rate
mean time between failures
mean time between outages
mechanically induced modulation
mediation function
medium power talker
message
message format
micro mainframe link
minimum bend radius
mixer
mode field diameter
mode partition noise
mode scrambler
mode volume
modification of final judgment
modified ami code
modulation factor
modulation rate
mu law algorithm
multicast address
multilevel precedence and preemption
multipath
multiple access
multiple homing
multiplex baseband
multiplexing
multiport repeater
narrative traffic