|
|
|
|
|
Projective LineIn mathematics, the projective line is a fundamental example of an algebraic curve. It may be defined over any field K, as the set of one-dimensional subspaces of the two-dimensional vector space K2; it does carry other geometric stuctures. It may be denoted as P1(K), but goes also by other names in particular areas. For the generalisation to the projective line over an associative ring, see inversive ring geometry. Real projective line For example in the case that K is the real number field, such a subspace is defined by the angle in radians it makes with the x-axis, modulo π. That is, the real projective line is related to the unit circle by the identication of diametrically opposite points; in terms of group theory we can take the quotient by the subgroup {1,−1}. Topologically it is again a circle. For a finite field The case of K a finite field F is also simple to understand. In this case if F has q elements, the projective line has - q + 1
elements. We can write all but one of the subspaces as - y = ax
with a in F; this leave out only the case of the line x = 0. For a finite field there is a definite loss if the projective line is taken to be this set, rather than an algebraic curve - one should at least see the underlying set of points in an algebraic closure as potentiially on the line. Complex projective line: the Riemann sphere The case of K the complex number field is the Riemann sphere (sometimes also called the Gauss sphere). It is in constant use in complex analysis, algebraic geometry and complex manifold theory, as the simplest example of a Riemann surface. Symmetry group Quite generally, the group of Mbius transformations with coefficients in K acts on the projective line P1(K). This group action is transitive, so that P1(K) is a homogeneous space for the group, often written PGL2(K) to emphasise its definition as a projective linear group. Transitivity says that any point Q may be transformed to any other point R by a Mbius transformation. The point at infinity on P1(K) is therefore an artefact of choice of coordinates: homogeneous coordinates X:Y = tX:tY express a one-dimensional subspace by a single point (X,Y) on it, but the symmetries of the projective line can move this point 1:0to any other, and it is in no way distinguished. Much more is true, in that some transformation can take any given distinct points Qi for i = 1,2,3 to any other 3-tuple Ri of distinct points (triple transitivity). This amount of specification 'uses up' the three dimensions of PGL2(K). The computational aspect of this is the cross-ratio. As algebraic curve From the point of view of algebraic geometry, P1(K) is a non-singular curve of genus 0. If K is algebraically closed, it is the unique such curve over K, up to isomorphism. In general (non-singular) curves of genus 0 are isomorphic over K to a conic C, which is the projective line if and only if C has a point defined over K; geometrically such a point P can be used as origin to make clear the correspondence using lines through P. The function field of the projective line is the field K(T) of rational functions over K, in a single indeterminate T. The field automorphisms of K(T) over K are precisely the group PGL2(K) discussed above. One reason for the great importance of the projective line is that any function field K(V) of an algebraic variety V over K, other than a single point, will have a subfield isomorphic with K(T). From the point of view of birational geometry, this means that there will be a rational map from V to P1(K), that is not constant. The image will omit only finitely many points of P1(K), and the inverse image of a typical point P will be of dimension dim V − 1. This is the beginning of methods in algebraic geometry that are inductive on dimension. The rational maps play a role analogous to the meromorphic functions of complex analysis, and indeed in the case of compact Riemann surfaces the two concepts coincide. If V is now taken to be of dimension 1, we get a picture of a typical algebraic curve C presented 'over' P1(K). Assuming C is non-singular (which is no loss of generality starting with K(C)), it can be shown that such a rational map from C to P1(K) will in fact be everywhere defined. (That is not the case if there are singularities, since for example a double point where a curve crosses itself may give an indeterminate result after a rational map.) This gives a picture in which the main geometric feature is ramification. Many curves, for example hyperelliptic curves, are best presented abstractly, as ramified covers of the projective line. According to the Riemann-Hurwitz formula, the genus then depends only on the type of ramification.
|
 |
|
| Copyright 2005-2009 OnPedia.com. All Rights Reserved |
|
|