Practice Statement

Until 1966, the House of Lords in the United Kingdom was bound to follow all of its previous decisions under the principle of stare decisis, even if this created "injustice" and "unduly restrict(s) the proper development of the law" (London Tramways Co. v London City Council 1898 AC 375). The Practice Statement 1966 is authority for the House of Lords to depart from their previous decisions. It does not affect the precedential value of cases in lower courts; all other courts that recognise the House of Lords as the court of last resort are still bound by House of Lords decisions. This is the text of the Practice Statement:
Their Lordships nevertheless recognise that too rigid adherence to precedent may lead to injustice in a particular case and also unduly restrict the proper development of the law. They propose, therefore to modify their present practice and, while treating former decisions of this House as normally binding, to depart from a previous decision when it appears right to do so. This announcement is not intended to affect the use of precedent elsewhere than in this House.
::: — Lord Gardiner's statement in the House of Lords, July 26, 1966.

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
alt.config
george hall
starfish
nigel mansell
football at the 1900 summer olympics
berkley
force research unit
golf at the 1900 summer olympics
gymnastics at the 1900 summer olympics
berwick
pelota basque at the 1900 summer olympics
semi generic
berwyn
east jersey
gerhard herzberg
eudora (email client)
phelps
polo at the 1900 summer olympics
bethlehem (disambiguation)
rudolf christoph eucken
ray romano
richard green
final form
a. j. foyt
rowing at the 1900 summer olympics
schock prize
rolf schock
lies
co dependency
rugby at the 1900 summer olympics
suslin's problem
don garlits
friedrich miescher
harry schmidt
tennessee ernie ford
chumphon province
instruction
donoghue v. stevenson
haughton v. smith
old believers
new world symphony
cynicism
otto lindblad
las almas del silencio