Patently Unreasonable

Patently unreasonable or the patent unreasonableness test is a legal test created by common law and used in Canada by a court performing judicial review of administrative decisions. It is the highest of three standards of review, those being correctness, unreasonableness, and patent unreasonableness. Although the term "patent unreasonableness" lacks a precise definition in the common law, it is somewhere above unreasonableness, and consequently it is difficult to prove that a decision is patently unreasonable. A simple example of a patently unreasonable decision may be one that does not accord at all with the facts or law before it, or one that completely misstates a legal test. In theory, according to the Supreme Court of Canada in Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration), this standard of review could also apply in a statutory appeal. In practice, this is highly unlikely, since the existence of a right of appeal often determines the standard of review to be correctness or unreasonableness. Compare this to due process in U.S. law and Wednesbury unreasonableness in English law.

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
paul petard
paul petard (cartoonist)
paul petard (botanist)
cunt (novel)
hejaz railway
tipperary hill
list of geographers
orangemen
harald cramr
cork taint
table grape
earnie shavers
ron lyle
concord grape
marcus daly
peter kozler
isfahan (city)
jerry quarry
jus commune
gantt chart
sediq afghan
iso 3166 1 alpha 3
adolf, grand duke of luxembourg
unix philosophy
prime minister of the united states
iso 3166 1 alpha 2
zephyr protocol
list of corps of the united states
zephyr
parkour
adolf of nassau
plane of symmetry
charles thomson
jim marrs
emperor penguin
pharyngitis
oscar protocol
tachypnea
jonestown
lymphopenia
jim jones
benny paret
university of colorado
associate's degree