Maximum Principle

In mathematics, the maximum principle in harmonic analysis states that if f is a harmonic function, then f cannot exhibit a true local maximum within the domain of definition of f. In other words, either f is a constant function, or, for any point x0 inside the domain of f, there exist other points arbitrarily close to x0 at which f takes larger values. Mathematically, this can be formulated as follows. Let f be defined on some open subset D of the Euclidean space Rn. If x0 is a point in D such that
f(x_0)\ge f(x)
for all x in a neighborhood of x0, then the function f is constant on D. By replacing "maximum" with "minimum" and "larger" with "smaller", one obtains the minimum principle for harmonic functions.

Heuristics behind the proof

The key ingredient for the proof is the fact that, by the definition of a harmonic function, the Laplacian of f is zero. Then, if x0 is a non-degenerate critical point of f(x), we must be seeing a saddle point, since otherwise there is no chance that the sum of the second derivatives of f is zero. This of course is not a complete proof, and we left out the case of x0 being a degenerate point, but this is the essential argument. The maximum principle holds in more general circumstances. In fact, it is broadly speaking a property of elliptic operators.

See also

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
association of caribbean states
celestial navigation trainer
universal server
hairy dan
mount scott
audi rs6
tzimtzum
thomas seaton scott
youssef wahba
janov pelorat
helpful henry
music of thrace
bryon wilfert
ablutions
pingsi line
jeremy castle
technical fall
mauro picotto
narcissus and goldmund
jim perry
absolution
judi longfield
yilan line
oval opus
rip van wink
velie
absolution (religious)
tbbs
vitreal
fredrick henry piesse
western line
chital
plasma torch
keiko utoku
rolly xipu
wee peem
mary ewing outerbridge
michael weiss
thomas lake
thomas j. dodd
land degradation
gurbax s. malhi
real radio
thomas mckay