Maccormick V. Lord Advocate

MacCormick v. Lord Advocate (1953 SC 396) was a Scottish lawsuit in which John MacCormick (the rector of Glasgow University) and Ian Hamilton contested the right of Queen Elizabeth II to style herself "Elizabeth II" within Scotland. This was perceived as a breach of the Act of Union 1707 between England and Scotland, since Queen Elizabeth I was Queen of England but not of Scotland. MacCormick and Hamilton lost their case: it was held that they had no title to sue the Crown, and also that the treaty had no provision concerning the numbering of monarchs — it was part of the royal prerogative. However, the Lord Justice General, Lord Cooper of Culross, gave his opinion that "the principle of unlimited sovereignty of Parliament is a distinctively English principle and has no counterpart in Scottish constitutional law": although Parliament might be permitted to overrule the treaty by English constitutional law, which treats Parliament as sovereign, it might be unable to do so under Scots law. The outcome of this case became of great relevance in 1999, when the British parliament was proposing the creation of a Scottish parliament.

See also

External links

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
klaus kinkel
italian region
the twelfth man
unified thread standard
digital divide network
aban
survivor: america's tribal council
henry iv, part 2
greedoid
leigh on sea
small faces (album)
ostroleka county
macross zero
u.s. doj office of special investigations
new utrecht reformed church
cucumber sandwich
provinces of uzbekistan
queen gwendolen
kudu
kuzu
james hannigan
joseph wambaugh
befana
spithead and nore mutinies
self realization
child support agency
andrew irvine
synarchism
list of the sopranos episodes
deive
dan and frank carney
surgical strike
julius curtius
packard hawk
rod walker
moosbronn
recruiter
american baptist
list of postal codes in norway
chs
miniature motorcycle racing
hans von rosenberg
headhunter (disambiguation)
leonid nikolaev