Klein Transformation

In quantum field theory, the Klein transformation is a redefinition of the fields to patch up the spin-statistics theorem.

Bose-Einstein

Let's say we have two fields φ and χ such that, if x and y are spacelike separated points and i and j represent the spinor/tensor indices,
\phi^i(x),\phi^j(y)=\chi^i(x),\chi^j(y)=\{\phi^i(x),\chi^j(y)\}=0
Let's also suppose χ is invariant under the Z2 parity (nothing to do with spatial reflections!) mapping χ to -χ but leaving φ invariant. Obviously, free field theories always satisfies this property. Then, the PARITY of the number of χ particles is well defined and is conserved in time (even though the number of χ particles itself depends on the choice of which splitting into a free Hamiltonian and an interacting Hamiltonian we make in the interaction picture, which doesn't even exist for interacting theories (the number is typically infinite)). Let's denote this parity by the operator Kχ which maps χ-even states to itself and χ-odd states into their negative. Then, Kχ is involutive, Hermitian and unitary. Needless to say, the fields φ and χ above don't have the proper statistics relations for either a boson or a fermion. i.e. they are bosonic with respect to themselves but fermionic with respect to each other. But if you look at the statistical properties alone, we find it has exactly the same statistics as the Bose-Einstein statistics. Here's why: Define two new fields φ' and χ' as follows:
\phi'=iK_{\chi}\phi
and
\chi'=K_{\chi}\chi
This redefinition is invertible (because Kχ is). Now, the spacelike commutation relations become
\phi'^i(x),\phi'^j(y)=\chi'^i(x),\chi'^j(y)=\phi'^i(x),\chi'^j(y)=0

Fermi-Dirac

Now, let's work with the example where
\{\phi^i(x),\phi^j(y)\}=\{\chi^i(x),\chi^j(y)\}=\phi^i(x),\chi^j(y)=0
(spacelike separated as usual) Let's assume once again we have a Z2 conserved parity operator Kχ acting upon χ alone. Let
\phi'=iK_{\chi}\phi
and
\chi'=K_{\chi}\chi
Then,
\{\phi'^i(x),\phi'^j(y)\}=\{\chi'^i(x),\chi'^j(y)\}=\{\phi'^i(x),\chi'^j(y)\}=0

More than two fields

But what if we have more than two fields? In that case, we can keep on applying the Klein transformation to each pair of fields with the "wrong" commutation/anticommutation relations until we're done. This explains the equivalence between parastatistics and the more familiar Bose-Einstein/fermi-Dirac statistics.

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
public funding
big rigs: over the road racing
heinrich i walpot von bassenheim
old swan band
shetland bus
burton gillett
otto von kerpen
heinrich ii von tunna
donal lunny
shaun davey
college of art, architecture and planning
wedding music
greater calgary area
titus groan
chongqing proper
rufus sewell
burton w. folsom, jr.
solectron
plumbeous kite
usa freedom corps
arnold fanck
seven hills, new south wales
uva province
amarinder singh
harmonium (poetry collection)
dead ball era
sweetbox
language death
universal code
hakone gardens
nathaniel b. palmer (icebreaker)
jrg breu
language shift
stan grant
mountain film
stan grant (junior)
control volume
sonya emery
john rudder
hengqin
ingrid rimland
language suicide
pappu yadav
language merger