Irish Supreme Court

The Supreme Court (Irish: Chirt Uachtarach) is the highest judicial authority in the Republic of Ireland. The Supreme Court is the "Court of Final Appeal" and exercises judicial review, to ensure that other institutions of the state comply with the Irish constitution. The Supreme Court consists of its presiding member, the Chief Justice, and seven other judges. Judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President in accordance with the binding advice of the Government. The Supreme Court currently sits in the Four Courts in Dublin.

Composition and functions

The precise number of judges of the Supreme Court may be changed by law. At present it consists of the Chief Justice and seven ordinary judges. In addition it also includes the President of the High Court who is ex officio a member of the court. The Supreme Court sits as a three, five or eight judge court and may sit in two or more divisions at the same time. When ruling on constitutional questions it must sit as either a five or eight judge court. Judges of the Supreme Court may be removed from office, but only for stated misbehaviour or incapacity. To remove a judge a resolution must be passed by both houses of the Oireachtas (parliament). Once such a motion has been approved the judge is dismissed by the President. The court has such appellate jurisdiction from decisions of the High Court and lower courts as is determined by law. However the law cannot exempt from the Supreme Court's jurisdiction the power to decide upon the constitutionality of laws. In practice the Supreme will usually only hear appeals on points of law. Under Article 12 of the constitution if the Supreme Court, in a sitting consisting of at least five judges, determines that the President has become "permanently incapacitated" then it may remove the President from office. The remuneration of a judge may not be diminished during their term of office. Today the Irish judiciary shares authority with two supra-national courts: the International Criminal Court and the European Court of Justice. In matters relating to the correct interpretation of European Union law decisions of the European Court of Justice take precedence over those of the Irish Supreme Court. Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights have been accepted as part of the Council of Europe system to which Ireland is also party. Although this may require legislation and states can derogate.

Judicial review

The Irish constitution states that:
every law enacted by the Oireachtas which is in any respect repugnant to this Constitution or to any provision thereof, shall, but to the extent only of such repugnancy, be invalid (Article 15.4.2).
The activities of the Government (executive) must also be both constitutional and legal. The constitution makes the Supreme Court the highest authority in interpreting the constitution and its decision on any such question is final. The court can therefore strike down laws, or provisions of laws, that it finds to be unconstitutional and order the Government to comply with the constitution. The Supreme Court also settles questions as to the correct interpretation of ordinary laws. However, the Supreme Court cannot declare to be invalid a law that has previously been referred to it by the President, under her reserve powers, and on that occasion been found to be constitutional. In its rulings the members of the Supreme Court are usually permitted to give dissenting opinions. However, when ruling on the constitutionality of a bill referred to it by the President, no such dissenting opinions are permitted. After a slow start in its first few decades the Supreme Court has made some important decisions in judicial review. In particular it has:
  • Ruled that Articles 2 and 3 (as they stood before 1999) did not impose obligations upon the state that were enforceable in a court of law
  • Ruled that major changes to the treaties establishing the European Union may not be ratified by the state unless accompanied by a constitutional amendment.
  • Discovered a broad right to privacy in marital affairs implicit in Article 41.
  • Discovered a right to an abortion where there is a risk to the life of the mother through suicide in Article 40.

Important rulings

Current judges (21st July, 2004)

Related topics

External link

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
apostolic vicariate
thug behram
kimberly hart
modernization
shakespeare programming language
nueva galicia
catherine sutherland
voting rights in the united states
menai suspension bridge
refractive surgery
uss chauncey
kamehameha iv
francisco cano
main course
regional engineering college
506th parachute infantry regiment
cuatro cinegas
utah beach
hotel marshall
national institutes of technology
gary morton
gold beach
victoria (game)
michael scanlan
doves
hverageri
boot up period
36 wooden men
finnish people
manolis andronikos
lophophora
phytonomy
henry eliot, 5th earl of st germans
jess carranza
caspar brtzmann
municipalities of slovenia
joseph bartlett eastman
public franchise league
gregory helms
literacy test
sopwith cuckoo
monclova
kathryn c. thornton
kabukicho