Haughton V. Smith

Haughton v. Smith, 1975 AC 476, 1973 3 All ER 1109, 1974 3 W.L.R. 1 is the House of Lords case dealing with attempted crimes in relation to actus reus. Lord Dilhorne's statement about the impossibility of crimes is often quoted at 19 (citing to All E.R..):
A man taking his own umbrella from a club, thinking it the property of someone else, does not steal. His belief does not convert his conduct into an offence. In my view, it matters not that the crime cannot be committed as a result of physical impossibility, e.g. the absence of the property he wants to steal, or of legal impossibility. In either case he cannot be convicted of an attempt when he could not be convicted of the full offence if he had succeeded in doing all that he attempted to do. Conduct which is not criminal is not converted into criminal conduct by the accused believing that a state of affairs exists which does not.
This case was subsequently overturned by statute. There is an in-depth discussion of the law of attempted crimes, in particular the debate about criminal liability in issues of impossible crimes.

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
east jersey
gerhard herzberg
eudora (email client)
phelps
polo at the 1900 summer olympics
bethlehem (disambiguation)
rudolf christoph eucken
ray romano
richard green
final form
a. j. foyt
rowing at the 1900 summer olympics
schock prize
practice statement
rolf schock
lies
co dependency
rugby at the 1900 summer olympics
suslin's problem
don garlits
friedrich miescher
harry schmidt
tennessee ernie ford
chumphon province
instruction
donoghue v. stevenson
old believers
new world symphony
cynicism
otto lindblad
las almas del silencio
post invasion iraq, 2003 2005
george herbert
mixed oxide fuel
burano
venetian lagoon
commune
isola di san michele
torcello
murano
lorna doone
bottle
gnome display manager
power (international)