Explanatory Gap

The basic idea of the explanatory gap is that human experience (such as qualia) cannot be fully explained by mechanical processes; that something extra, perhaps even of a different metaphysical type, must be added to "fill the gap". The Explanatory Gap has vexed and intrigued philosophers and AI researchers alike for decades and caused considerable debate. To take a condition in which there is no gap, imagine a modern computer: as marvelous as these devices are, their behavior can be fully explained by their circuitry, and vice versa. By contrast, it is thought by some that consciousness constitutes a separate effect that demands another cause, and that this cause is either outside of the physical world (dualism) or due to as yet unknown physical phenomena (see for instance Quantum mind, Indirect realism). John Searle's Chinese Room thought experiment was an attempt to illustrate the explanatory gap.

See also

* consciousness

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
otis
saleos
purson
morax
naberius
alejandro jodorowsky
tampon
albanian alphabet
fujian tea ceremony
morbier cheese
bill laswell
green tea
flanging
russian sfsr
lotus position
phasing
harlequin duck
apronym
tanya grotter
tatiana
riau
baraitha
rengat
special forces of india
slash and burn
aerial bombing of cities
avraham stern
open government information awareness
cyanotype
audio level compression
hoatzin
necrophilia
operation elmira
ecm
robert mcintyre
bondage cuffs
diamanda gals
tango (dance)
tango (drink)
abd al rahman al sufi
ubl
self bondage
chen yun
operation latchkey