Other Definitions
entailment (dict)

Entailment

Implication or entailment is used in propositional logic and predicate logic to describe a relationship between two sentences or sets of sentences.

Semantic Implication

A \models B states that the set A of sentences semantically entails the set B of sentences. Formal definition: the set A entails the set B if and only if, in every model in which all sentences in A are true, all sentences in B are also true. In diagram form, it looks like this: A entails B We need the definition of entailment to demand that every model of A must also be a model of B because a formal system like a knowledge base can't possibly know the interpretations which a user might have in mind when they ask whether a set of facts (A) entails a proposition (B) In pragmatics (linguistics), entailment has a different, but closely related, meaning. If \varnothing \models X for a formula X then X is said to be "valid" or "tautological".

Logical Implication

A \vdash B states that the set A of sentences logically entails the set B of sentences. It can be read as "B can be proven from A". Definition: A logically entails B if, by assuming all sentences in A and applying a finite sequence of inference rules to them (for example, those from propositional calculus), one can derive all sentences in B. This is, of course, relative to a specific logic (proof calculus). In cases where multiple logics are under discussion, it may be useful to put a subscript on the \vdash symbol.

Relationship between Semantic and Logical Implication

Ideally, semantic implication and logical implication would be equivalent. However, this may not always be feasible. (See Gdel's incompleteness theorem, which states that some languages (such as arithmetic) contain true but unprovable sentences.) In such a case, it is useful to break the equivalence down into its two parts: A deductive system S is complete for a language L if and only if A \models_L X implies A \vdash_S X: that is, if all valid arguments are provable. A deductive system S is sound for a language L if and only if A \vdash_S X implies A \models_L X: that is, if no invalid arguments are provable.

Relationship with Material Implication

In many cases, entailment corresponds to material implication: that is, A, X \models Y if and only if A \models X \to Y . However, this is not true in some many-valued logics.

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
giovanni falcone
bagheria
milazzo
termini imerese
pentiti
zakopane
syntactic category
corleone
cuisine of sicily
lodz
frutta martorana
cassata siciliana
olsztyn
pragmatics
luchino visconti
cesare zavattini
sergio tofano
1540s bc
seven hills of rome
dabrowa gornicza
mortadella
manuel i comnenus
speech act
limit superior and limit inferior
manuel ii palaeologus
presupposition
deixis
alessandro manzoni
edward ii of england
brad pitt
kidinnu
radical party
1050s bc
1090s bc
1120s bc
1130s bc
1140s bc
1150s bc
1520s bc
1530s bc
1070s bc
1080s bc
1060s bc
1160s bc