Congruence Relation

In mathematics and especially in abstract algebra, a congruence relation or simply congruence is an equivalence relation that is compatible with some algebraic operation(s).

Definition

Two numbers a , b are called "congruent mod n" if (a-b)/n is an integer number.

Modular arithmetic

The prototypical example is modular arithmetic: If a_1 \equiv b_1 \pmod n and a_2 \equiv b_2 \pmod n, then a_1+a_2 \equiv b_1+b_2 \pmod n and a_1a_2 \equiv b_1b_2 \pmod n. This turns the equivalence (mod n) into a congruence on the ring of all integers.

In universal algebra

The idea is generalized in universal algebra: A congruence relation on an algebra A is a subset of the direct product A × A that is both an equivalence relation on A and a subalgebra of A × A. Congruences typically arise as kernels of homomorphisms, and in fact every congruence is the kernel of some homomorphism: For a given congruence ~ on A, the set A/~ of equivalence classes can be given the structure of an algebra in a natural fashion, the quotient algebra. Furthermore, the function that maps every element of A to its equivalence class is a homomorphism, and the kernel of this homomorphism is ~.

Group theory

In the particular case of groups, congruence relations can be described in elementary terms as follows: If G is a group (with identity element e) and ~ is a binary relation on G, then ~ is a congruence whenever:
  1. Given any element a of G, a ~ a;
  2. Given any elements a and b of G, if a ~ b, then b ~ a;
  3. Given any elements a, b, and c of G, if a ~ b and b ~ c, then a ~ c;
  4. e ~ e;
  5. Given any elements a and a' of G, if a ~ a', then a−1 ~ a'−1;
  6. Given any elements a, a', b, and b' of G, if a ~ a' and b ~ b', then a * b ~ a' * b'.
(However, we can actually shorten the list of requirements to just numbers 1, 2, 3, and 6.) Notice that such a congruence ~ is determined entirely by the set {aG : a ~ e} of those elements of G that are congruent to the identity element, and this set is a normal subgroup. Specifically, a ~ b iff b−1 * a ~ e. So instead of talking about congruences on groups, people usually speak in terms of normal subgroups of them; in fact, every congruence corresponds uniquely to some normal subgroup of G. This is what makes it possible to speak of kernels in group theory as subgroups, while in more general universal algebra, kernels are congruences.

Ring theory

A similar trick allows one to speak of kernels in ring theory as ideals instead of congruence relations, and in module theory as submodules instead of congruence relations.

General case of kernels

The most general situation where this trick is possible is in ideal-supporting algebras. But this cannot be done with, for example, monoids, so the study of congruence relations plays a more central role in monoid theory.

See also

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
visby
gdel, escher, bach
locri
dick bruna
miffy
tonya harding
jimmie rodgers
society for worldwide interbank financial telecommunication
roman naming convention
alsace
hare
berber
temple
amazon rainforest
proxy arp
microcomputer
bebop
fossil fuel
art rock
fiat money
commodity money
intersection (set theory)
marion tinsley
walter hellman
peotone, illinois
a priori
adrienne rich
mental illness (alphabetical list)
list of national parks of the netherlands
manowar
chinook
pino
humanoid robot
arguments against the existence of god
bronislaw pilsudski
ucpmb
william ramsay
atari demos
surrey
commodity markets
national liberation army
camera obscura
green money
the exceptions