Class (Philosophy)

Philosophers sometimes distinguish classes from types and kinds. We can talk about the class of human beings, just as we can talk about the type (or natural kind), human being, or humanity. How, then, might classes differ from types? One might well think they are not actually different categories of being, but typically, while both are treated as abstract objects, classes are not usually treated as universals, whereas types usually are. Whether natural kinds ought to be considered universals is vexed; see natural kind. There is, in any case, a difference in how we talk about types and kinds versus how we talk about classes. We say that Socrates is a token of a type, or an instance of the natural kind, human being. But notice that we say instead that Socrates is a member of the class of human beings. We would not say that Socrates is a "member" of the type or kind, human beings. Nor would we say he is a type (or kind) of a class. He is a token (instance) of the type (kind). So the linguistic difference is: types (or kinds) have tokens (or instances); classes, on the other hand, have members.

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
massam
fedora linux
rockhopper penguin
kenneth e. hagin
eid ul adha
partial birth abortion ban act
salah
roof garden
bo'ness
peterhead
class (movie)
dumbarton
portree
helensburgh
joo de portugal
heliosheath
brentwood, washington, dc
ffion hague
westminster abbey choir school
polish minority in the soviet union
the player
tribeca
clarkston
sunnyside
hong kong philharmonic orchestra
unionville
cayley graph
hairspray (musical)
teknap
sydney symphony orchestra
possessions of sweden
bailiff (channel islands)
nvu
saint barthlemy, landes
closed form
the call of the wild
gibson girl
doug
central lithuania
denise bloch
theos multi user basic
the happiest millionaire
dungeon
lothar bisky