Argumentum Ad Baculum

Argumentum ad baculum (Latin: argument to the cudgel or appeal to the stick), also known as appeal to force, is said by some to be a logical fallacy. It is where force, or the threat of force, is given as an argument for a conclusion. One participates in argumentum ad baculum when one points out the negative consequences of holding the contrary position. For example, many young people in the United States who opposed the Vietnam War were told that they should not hold such a view, because they would face discrimination from potential employers. A similar fallacy is the claim that one should believe in the validity of the Bible lest God strike you down! Since the Middle Ages, this form of argument has been identified as a logical fallacy by many philosophers, but pragmatists and others claim not only that it is no fallacy, but rather that many of our beliefs are based on this kind of useful reasoning. The argumentum ad baculum is a special case of argumentum ad consequentiam, or "appeal to consequences".

 

<< PreviousWord BrowserNext >>
harry truman (volcano victim)
henry iv of silesia
daytona 500
archduke franz ferdinand of austria
netiquette
mike tyson
bamboo
r. j. mitchell
rolls royce merlin
air ministry
robert oppenheimer
hanford site
lawrence livermore national laboratory
ernest lawrence
xenopus laevis
mesoderm
peter tork
laboratory for atmospheric and space physics
robert s. mulliken
library of congress classification:class l education
cape cod national seashore
provincetown, massachusetts
straw man
wellfleet, massachusetts
wisent
wellfleet oyster
french and indian war
casimir iv of poland
list of religions
digital circuit
maximilian i, holy roman emperor
samuel de champlain
sifaka
spiro agnew
battle of mohcs
peter schickele
the stoned guest
library of congress classification:class b philosophy, psychology, religion
boris godunov (opera)
waylon jennings
black tie
richard somers
uss somers
os 9